From Free IPA
[edit]
Roadmap
[edit]
Contents
[edit]
Release 1
Date: April 2008 (estimated)
Overview: User identity management and centralized authentication for Unix/Linux world
Components: The release will include:
- Linux Distribution (Fedora / Red Hat Enterprise Linux / CentOS)
- Fedora Directory Server
- MIT Kerberos
- NTP
- Tools for installation
- Administrative tools (web and command-line)
Main use cases to be solved
- Authenticate user to Linux/Unix using Kerberos/LDAP instead of NIS.
- Set up Directory/Kerberos enviroment easily
- Manage Linux/Unix user identity centrally and more easily (GUI)
- Enable basic synch with AD and roadmap to a more robust synch
Compelling reason to use
- Compliance is forcing organizations off of NIS
- Efficiency is forcing organizations to a better identity management solution
- Too expensive to maintain an LDAP/Kerberos implementation themselves
[edit]
Release 2
Target Date: Targeting April/May 2009
Overview: Machine and Service Identity. Policy. Audit. Pluggable.
Main use cases to be solved
- Machine authentication and identity
- Identify and group machines (and virtual instances)
- Allow new machines to join IPA and gain an identity
- Easily provide each machine with a kerberos principal and certificate
- Use above to authenticate machines and provide trust
- Service authentication and identity
- Identify and group applications for the purpose of applying policy to them
- Provide service specific kerberos keytabs and certificates
- Manage the certificates, autorenew
- Create an IPA plugin Architecture and framework
- Create IPA client that manages authentication, cache, connection state to IPA, and will be used to manage authorization
- Policy and Access Control
- Set and enforce policy of which users can access which apps on which machines.
- Enable centrally managed pam login, SELinux, sudoers
- Audit
- Centrally collect and audit (i) security events (ii) all logs (iii) every keystroke by a selected group of users and or machines
Compelling reason to use
- Compliance and efficiency push to have a better access control solution for the Linux/Unix world
- Compliance and efficiency motivate to centrally manage administrator delegation and sudo configuration
- Security and compliance push to centrally understand/analyze audit events


